Londoners' trust drives Met push for more diverse officers
Crime & Society

Londoners' trust drives Met push for more diverse officers

Rowley says understanding victims and communities is an operational necessity

When a victim of domestic violence picks up the phone, everything can depend on whether the officer who answers understands her. That conviction runs through a new recruitment drive launched by Metropolitan police commissioner Sir Mark Rowley, who argues that London’s police force simply cannot do its job if large sections of the capital do not trust it, work with it, or see it as a service that understands their lives.

Last Monday, the Met launched a major recruitment campaign aimed at drawing talent from every corner of London, particularly from communities the force has historically drawn least from. Rowley has no patience with those who frame such efforts as ideology. Inclusion, he insists, is an operational necessity, not a public relations exercise. “We have no interest in the politics and ideologies of the culture wars,” he writes.

The stakes, in his telling, are intensely practical. The Met cannot give an equally good response to all victims if its understanding of some Londoners is weaker than others. That is obvious when it comes to language barriers or supporting deaf people. But it matters just as much when culture, experience or background may make a victim less willing to talk about sexual abuse, domestic violence or other traumatic crimes. When victims speak to officers and staff who understand them, they feel fairly and impartially treated, and more crime is solved. When victims feel understood, they are more likely to come forward. When communities trust the police, they report crime, share intelligence and support investigations.

That trust, Rowley argues, goes to the very heart of policing by consent, the principle Sir Robert Peel recognised when founding the Metropolitan police in 1829: that policing in a democracy relies on public approval, respect and cooperation as much as on impartial service to the law. London today, with nine million people and hundreds of languages, is a far more complex city than Peel could have imagined. The scale of the challenge has grown accordingly, but the founding insight still holds.

The practical consequences reach into areas many Londoners rarely see. Rowley wants more women and people from underrepresented backgrounds putting themselves forward for some of the most exciting roles in British policing: firearms teams, the flying squad, counter-terrorism, specialist operations, public protection and major investigations. Officers are needed who can carry out surveillance, work undercover and build trust with victims of violence against women and girls.

Fairness is also essential where police powers are used directly, including stop and search, where empathy and accountability are needed to maintain public confidence. By listening to people’s lived experiences and working in partnership with communities, Rowley writes, the force can build stronger relationships and greater legitimacy.

There is progress to point to. Last year the Met had the most representative intake of recruits in its history, with more women and more Londoners from ethnic-minority backgrounds joining. Still, the force is not attracting talent equally. Some potential recruits worry they will not fit in; others are discouraged by family or friends. The recruitment campaign is designed to challenge those perceptions and remove those barriers.

Rowley is blunt about the criticism such efforts attract. Some wrongly suggest that increasing representation means lowering standards. Nothing could be further from the truth, he says: standards remain unchanged and uncompromising, and for generations talented people from some communities have faced barriers that limited their chance to join policing or build a career in it. Tackling those barriers is not favouritism, but fairness, and it widens the pool of talent available.

Meanwhile, public debate on inclusion has become increasingly polarised, with many assuming it competes with impartiality or merit. Rowley rejects that framing. As commissioner, he believes the Met’s success in protecting communities and helping London thrive requires inclusivity as well as impartiality, and he says the force will not be blown off course.

Mark Rowley is commissioner of the Metropolitan police. Whether the campaign can shift both recruitment numbers and public trust across the capital remains the open question.

Q&A

Why does Sir Mark Rowley say a more diverse police force matters?

He argues it is an operational necessity: victims are more willing to come forward and more crime is solved when they speak to officers and staff who understand their language, culture and experience, and communities that trust the police report crime, share intelligence and support investigations.

What kinds of roles does the recruitment campaign encourage underrepresented groups to pursue?

Firearms teams, the flying squad, counter-terrorism, specialist operations, public protection and major investigations, including roles involving surveillance, undercover work and building trust with victims of violence against women and girls.

How does Rowley respond to claims that increasing representation lowers standards?

He rejects the claim outright, saying standards remain unchanged and uncompromising, and that removing barriers that have limited talented people from some communities is fairness, not favouritism, and widens the pool of talent.

What progress has the Met made so far?

Last year the Met had the most representative intake of recruits in its history, with more women and more Londoners from ethnic-minority backgrounds joining, though some potential recruits still worry they will not fit in or are discouraged by family or friends.